(PC) Mehari v. Cox et al, No. 2:2008cv01089 - Document 28 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/1/09 ORDERING that the Findings and Recommendations filed 5/19/09 27 are ADOPTED in full; Defendants' 9/15/08 MOTION to DISMISS 13 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Mehari v. Cox et al Doc. 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ZENAWE MAHARI, 12 No. 2:08-cv-01089-MCE-DAD P Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 R.V. COX, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 / 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. 20 On May 19, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 19, 2009, are adopted in full; 2 2. Defendants’ September 15, 2008 motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 13) is denied. 3 Dated: July 1, 2009 4 5 6 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
