(PC) Brownlee v. Clayton et al, No. 2:2008cv00661 - Document 21 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 12/23/09 ADOPTING 18 Findings and Recommendations in full. The case is dismissed without prejudice as to all dfts. Pltf is given 30 days from service of this order to file an amended complaint. If Pltf chooses to file an amended complaint, he must set forth in detail how dfts' actions or failures to act deprived him of his constitutional rights. (Engbretson, K.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Brownlee v. Clayton et al Doc. 21 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TERRENCE BROWNLEE, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 15 16 No. CIV S-08-0661 LKK GGH P vs. R. CLAYTON, et al., Defendants. ORDER / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. 19 On October 8, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections 21 to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72- 24 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire 25 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 8, 2009, are adopted in 2. The case is dismissed without prejudice as to all defendants. Plaintiff is 4 5 6 7 full; and given thirty (30) days from service of this order to file an amended complaint. 3. If plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint, he must set forth in 8 detail how defendants’ actions or failures to act deprived him of his constitutional rights. 9 Specifically, he must articulate for each defendant (1) the specific actions or failures to act; and 10 (2) how these specific actions or failures to act harmed plaintiff. Plaintiff must explain all 11 relevant incidents by reference to specific facts as to how each defendant harmed him. 12 DATED: December 23, 2009. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
