(PS) Velasco et al v. Mis Amigos Meat Market, Inc. et al, No. 2:2008cv00520 - Document 54 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 4/1/09 ORDERING that the FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS filed 3/16/09 18 are ADOPTED in full. Defendants' Motion to set aside the Clerk's entry of default 18 is GRANTED. Defendants are ordered to file their responsive pleading within twenty (20) days.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) Velasco et al v. Mis Amigos Meat Market, Inc. et al Doc. 54 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MIGUEL VELASCO, ELIESER SERRANO, NICOLAS VELASCO, individually and acting in the interest of other current and former employees, No. CIV. S-08-0520 WBS EFB 12 13 14 15 Plaintiffs, vs. MIS AMIGOS MEAT MARKET, INC, and URIEL GONZALEZ, ORDER Defendants. __________________________________/ 16 Defendants’ motion to set aside entry of default came on for hearing before the 17 18 assigned magistrate judge on December 3, 2008. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(19) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 20 On March 16, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 21 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any 22 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections 23 were filed. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed March 16, 2009, are adopted in full; 3 4 2. Defendants’ motion to set aside the Clerk’s entry of default, Dckt. No. 18, is GRANTED; and 5 3. Defendants are ordered to file their responsive pleading within twenty (20) 6 days. 7 DATED: April 1, 2009 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
