(HC) Knox v. Martel et al, No. 2:2008cv00494 - Document 22 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 5/11/10 ORDERING the Findings and Recommendations 21 are ADOPTED IN FULL; petitioner's motions to stay 19 , 20 are DENIED. (Carlos, K) Modified on 5/12/2010 (Carlos, K).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Knox v. Martel et al Doc. 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY MARCELOUS KNOX, SR, No. CIV S-08-0494-MCE-CMK-P 12 Petitioner, 13 vs. ORDER 14 M. MARTEL, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 / 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of 18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. 20 On March 31, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 21 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file 22 objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have 23 been filed. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis. 26 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 31, 2010, are adopted in 2. Petitioner’s motions to stay (Docs. 19, 20) are denied. 3 4 5 full; and Dated: May 11, 2010 6 7 8 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
