(PS) Goode v. St. Jude Medical, et al, No. 2:2008cv00302 - Document 25 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, recommending this action be dismissed without prejudice and Clerk be directed to close the case, signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/19/2010. Within 14 days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, plaintiff may file written Objections with Court. (Marciel, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) Goode v. St. Jude Medical, et al Doc. 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARY GOODE, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 No. CIV S-08-0302 MCE EFB PS vs. ST. JUDE MEDICAL, TWEED HANUSEK, BILL HILTON, ST. JUDE MEDICAL CARDIAC, RUTH GAGARIN, IRMA ESTRADA, BRIDGET FELLOWS, NICOLE ARANA, NES KUSNIERZ, KATHY CHESTER, ST JUDE MEDICAL CARDIAC RHYTHM MANAGEMENT and DOES 1-20, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 17 Defendants. 18 / 19 20 This action, in which plaintiff is proceeding in propria persona, was referred to the 21 undersigned under Local Rule 302(c)(21), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On February 1, 22 2010, the district court adopted this court’s findings and recommendations and granted 23 defendants’ motions to dismiss in part. That order dismissed plaintiff’s amended complaint with 24 leave to amend within sixty days. 25 //// 26 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 The sixty-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the order.1 3 Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 4 prejudice, and that the Clerk be directed to close this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 5 110. 6 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 7 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 8 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 9 objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 10 Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time 11 may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 12 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 13 DATED: April 19, 2010. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 1 25 26 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
