(HC) Kao v. Knowles et al, No. 2:2007cv02739 - Document 27 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/31/09 ORDERING the Findings and Recommendations 20 are ADOPTED IN FULL; petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. CASE CLOSED. (Carlos, K)

Download PDF
(HC) Kao v. Knowles et al Doc. 27 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHUNG KAO, 11 12 13 14 Petitioner, vs. MIKE KNOWLES, et al., Respondents. 15 16 No. CIV S-07-2739 LKK CHS P ORDER / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ 17 of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States 18 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. 19 On May 21, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 21 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72- 24 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire 25 file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 26 proper analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed on May 21, 2009, are adopted in full; 3 4 5 and 2. Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied. DATED: August 31, 2009. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.