(PC) Riches v. Day-Lewis, No. 2:2007cv02713 - Document 3 (E.D. Cal. 2007)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/20/07 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed. Objections to F&Rs due within 20 days. (Engbretson, K.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Riches v. Day-Lewis Doc. 3 Case 2:07-cv-02713-GEB-DAD Document 3 Filed 12/21/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JONATHAN LEE RICHES, 11 12 13 Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-2713 GEB DAD P vs. DANIEL DAY-LEWIS, 14 Defendant. 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS / 16 Plaintiff, a federal prisoner in South Carolina, has named Daniel Day-Lewis, an 17 actor in the movie “Gangs of New York,” as the defendant in this action. Plaintiff alleges that he 18 saw the movie in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, that the movie caused him “emotional trauma,” and 19 that now he has the “warriors, and subway bullies after me on defendant’s orders.” (Compl. at 20 1.) Plaintiff also contends that defendant has cancelled his magazine subscription, served him 21 non-Kosher meals, and acquired plaintiff’s website. Plaintiff seeks twenty million dollars in 22 damages. 23 Plaintiff fails to show that this is an appropriate venue for this action, see 28 24 U.S.C. § 1391 et. seq., or that his claim is cognizable, 28 U.S.C. § 1330 et. seq. The court finds 25 that plaintiff’s complaint is frivolous and will recommend that it be dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. 26 § 1915A(b)(1),(2). 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:07-cv-02713-GEB-DAD Document 3 Filed 12/21/2007 Page 2 of 2 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. 2 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 3 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty 4 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 5 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 6 Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 7 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 8 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 9 DATED: December 20, 2007. 10 11 12 13 DAD:4 rich2713.56 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
