(PC) Fryman v. Traquina et al, No. 2:2007cv02636 - Document 47 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/18/10 ORDERING the Findings and Recommendations 46 are ADOPTED IN FULL; dfts' Amended Motion for Summary Judgment 35 is DENIED. (Carlos, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Fryman v. Traquina et al Doc. 47 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN FRYMAN, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. CIV S-07-2636 JAM DAD P vs. A. TRAQUINA, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed this civil rights 17 action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 18 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. 19 On December 23, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither 22 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed December 23, 2009, are adopted in full; 3 2. Defendants’ June 10, 2009 amended motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 4 35) is denied. 5 DATED: February 18, 2010 6 /s/ John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
