(PC) Jayne v. Sprint PCS, et al, No. 2:2007cv02522 - Document 92 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 4/20/09 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address; objections due within 20 days of being served with these findings and recommendations. (Gaydosh, J)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Jayne v. Sprint PCS, et al Doc. 92 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL AARON JAYNE, 11 12 Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-2522 LKK GGH P vs. 13 SPRINT PCS, INC., et al., 14 Defendants. 15 FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / 16 Recent court orders have been served on plaintiff's address of record and returned 17 by the postal service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 83-182(f), 18 which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. 19 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for 20 plaintiff's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rules 83-182(f) and 21 11-110. 22 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 23 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty 24 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 25 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 26 Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 2 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 DATED: April 20, 2009 4 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 5 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 GGH:009/md jayn2522.33a 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
