(PC) Jayne v. Anderson Police Dept., et al, No. 2:2007cv02522 - Document 137 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/31/2010 ORDERING that The 135 findings and recommendations filed July 15, 2010, are adopted in full. The 97 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to all defendants and this case is closed. CASE CLOSED. (Duong, D)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Jayne v. Anderson Police Dept., et al Doc. 137 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL AARON JAYNE, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:07-cv-2522 LKK KJN P vs. SPRINT P.C.S., et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state parolee presently housed in the Shasta County Jail, proceeding 17 pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was 18 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 19 302. 20 On July 15, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 ///// 25 ///// 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 2 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire 3 file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 4 proper analysis. 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 6 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 15, 2010, are adopted in full; and 7 2. The motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 97) is granted as to all defendants 8 and this case is closed. 9 DATED: August 31, 2010. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
