(HC) Olivo v. Reece et al, No. 2:2007cv02452 - Document 31 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 30 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 10/02/09; Petitioners petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. (Benson, A.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Olivo v. Reece et al Doc. 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AUGUSTINE OLIVO, Petitioner, 11 vs. 12 13 No. CIV S-07-02452 WBS CHS P RICHARD IVES, Warden, et al., Respondents. 14 ORDER / 15 Petitioner, a federal inmate proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ 16 17 of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to a United States 18 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. On September 4, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 19 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither 22 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed on September 4, 2009, are adopted in full; and 3 4 2. Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied. DATED: October 2, 2009 5 6 7 8 9 10 / 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
