(PC) Jackson v. Solano County Sheriff et al, No. 2:2007cv02424 - Document 7 (E.D. Cal. 2008)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/1/2008 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr., Objections due 20 days after being served with these F & R's. (Reader, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Jackson v. Solano County Sheriff et al Doc. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RACARDO JACKSON, 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff, vs. SOLANO COUNTY SHERIFF, et al., Defendants. 15 16 No. CIV S-07-2424 FCD GGH P FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / By order filed November 19, 2007, the court granted plaintiff thirty days to file an 17 amended complaint. In the November 19th order, the court informed plaintiff of the deficiencies 18 in his complaint. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended 19 complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 20 For the reasons given in the November 19, 2007, order, IT IS HEREBY 21 RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. 22 R. Civ. P. 41(b). 23 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 24 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 25 twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file 26 written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections 2 within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 3 DATED: 02/01/08 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 4 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 jack2424.fta 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
