(PC) Williams v. Walker et al, No. 2:2007cv02385 - Document 63 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 6/23/2010 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 60 are ADOPTED in FULL; The unserved defendant Malfi is DISMISSED from this case without prejudice. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
(PC) Williams v. Walker et al Doc. 63 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN WESLEY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 No. CIV S-07-2385 WBS GGH P J. WALKER, et al., Defendants. 14 ORDER / 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 16 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 3, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 19 20 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 21 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither party has 22 filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 3, 2010, are adopted in full; 2 2. The unserved defendant Malfi is dismissed from this case without prejudice. 3 DATED: June 23, 2010 4 5 6 7 8 9 will2385.801 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.