(PC) Fisher v. Felker, et al, No. 2:2007cv02271 - Document 61 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Philip M. Pro on 1/19/11 ORDERING 59 Findings and Recommendations is adopted in full; and plaintiff Al Gene Fisher's First Amended Complaint (Doc. #13) against Defendants Wong, Jackson, Grannis, Roche, Felker, Amero, Smith, Richardson and Chrones is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Matson, R)

Download PDF
(PC) Fisher v. Felker, et al Doc. 61 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 -oOo- 7 8 AL GENE FISHER, Plaintiff, 9 10 vs. 11 T. FELKER, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:07-CV-02271-PMP-GWF ORDER Before the Court for consideration is Plaintiff Al Gene Fisher’s First 14 15 Amended Complaint (Doc. #13), filed on May 12, 2008. On December 17, 2010, the 16 Honorable George Foley, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge, entered a Report of 17 Findings and Recommendations (Doc. #59) recommending that Plaintiff’s First 18 Amended Complaint (Doc. #13) be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a 19 claim upon which relief may be granted. 20 On December 17, 2010, Plaintiff Fisher was served with Magistrate Judge 21 Foley’s Report of Findings and Recommendation (Doc. #59) advising Plaintiff that 22 he had 20 days to file in writing with the Clerk of Court any objections to the Report 23 of Findings and Recommendation (Doc. #59). The time to file any objections has 24 now expired. 25 /// 26 /// Dockets.Justia.com 1 The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in 2 accordance with 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1) and determines that Magistrate Judge Foley’s 3 Report of Findings and Recommendation should be Affirmed. 4 5 6 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Foley’s Report of Findings and Recommendation (Doc. #59) is Affirmed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Al Gene Fisher’s First 7 Amended Complaint (Doc. #13) against Defendants Wong, Jackson, Grannis, Roche, 8 Felker, Amero, Smith, Richardson and Chrones is DISMISSED with prejudice for 9 failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 10 11 DATED: January 19, 2011. 12 13 PHILIP M. PRO United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.