(PC) Rodgers v. Tilton et al, No. 2:2007cv02269 - Document 79 (E.D. Cal. 2013)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 3/19/2013 ADOPTING 78 Findings and Recommendations in full; DENYING 74 Motion to Withdraw Settlement Agreement and Re-open Proceedings. (Michel, G)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Rodgers v. Tilton et al Doc. 79 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN RODGERS, 11 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, No. 2:07-cv-2269 WBS DAD vs. JAMES E. TILTON, et al., Defendant. ORDER / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On February 7, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither 22 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and 24 recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility 25 to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), 26 service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 2 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 3 ORDERED that: 4 5 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 7, 2013, are adopted in full; and 6 2. Plaintiff’s motion to withdraw the settlement agreement and re-open 7 proceedings (Doc. No. 74) is denied 8 DATED: March 19, 2013 9 10 11 12 13 14 /rodg2269.803 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
