(PC) Rodgers v. Tilton et al, No. 2:2007cv02269 - Document 53 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 9/28/10 ORDERING that the 51 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED in full; Pltf's 43 Motion to Amend and 45 Motion to Vacate are DENIED. (Owen, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Rodgers v. Tilton et al Doc. 53 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN RODGERS, Plaintiff, 11 No. CIV S-07-2269 WBS DAD P vs. 12 13 JAMES E. TILTON, et al., 14 Defendants. ORDER / 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 16 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On September 7, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections 21 to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not 22 filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 7, 2010, are adopted in full; 3 2. Plaintiff’s April 19, 2010, motion to amend (Doc. No. 43) is denied; and 4 3. Plaintiff’s April 26, 2010, motion to vacate (Doc. No. 45) is denied. 5 DATED: September 28, 2010 6 7 8 9 10 /rodg2269.800 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
