(PC) Lal v. Felker et al, No. 2:2007cv02060 - Document 106 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/24/2010 ORDERING that the 98 findings and recommendations filed July 26, 2010 are adopted in full. Plaintiff's 97 July 15, 2010 motion for a permanent injunction is DENIED and Plaintiff's 101 July 29, 2010 motion for a permanent injunction is DENIED. (Duong, D)

Download PDF
(PC) Lal v. Felker et al Doc. 106 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AZHAR LAL, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 No. CIV S-07-2060 GEB EFB P T. FELKER, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On July 26, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 21 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations.1 23 //// 24 25 26 1 Although plaintiff did not file objections to the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations, he did file a supplemental motion on July 29, 2010. For the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge’s July 26 findings and recommendations, that motion is likewise denied. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 2 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 3 ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 26, 2010 are adopted in full; 5 2. Plaintiff’s July 15, 2010 motion for a permanent injunction is denied; and 6 3. Plaintiff’s July 29, 2010 motion for a permanent injunction is denied. 7 Dated: September 24, 2010 8 9 10 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.