-CMK (PC) Pamer v. Schwarzenegger et al, No. 2:2007cv01902 - Document 100 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 92 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 3/29/2011. Plaintiff's 89 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. (Marciel, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-CMK (PC) Pamer v. Schwarzenegger et al Doc. 100 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LAWRENCE PAMER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 No. 2:07-cv-01902-MCE-CMK-P vs. ORDER 14 ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 / 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern 19 District of California local rules. 20 On January 21, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations (Doc. 92) 21 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file 22 objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have 23 been filed. 24 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis. 26 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. 3 4 5 The findings and recommendations filed January 21, 2011 (ECF No. 92), are adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 89) is denied. Dated: March 29, 2011 6 7 8 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
