-CMK (TEMP)(PC) Adams v. Carcy et al, No. 2:2007cv01878 - Document 44 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 01/13/11 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-CMK (TEMP)(PC) Adams v. Carcy et al Doc. 44 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD ADAMS, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 No. CIV S-07-1878 JAM CMK (TEMP) P P. CARCY, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS / By an order filed March 23, 2010, plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status was revoked 17 and he was ordered to pay the appropriate filing fees within thirty days and was cautioned that 18 failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day 19 period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not paid the 20 appropriate filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be 21 dismissed without prejudice. 22 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 23 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty- 24 one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 25 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 26 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are 2 advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the 3 District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 5 DATED: January 13, 2011 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 hm adam1878.fifp 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
