Sananikone v. United States of America, No. 2:2007cv01434 - Document 83 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/5/10 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 6/15/10 81 are ADOPTED; Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff's Application for default against counterclaim defendant Paul Ta 75 , 77 is DENIED without prejudice. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Sananikone v. United States of America Doc. 83 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PUONGPUN SANANIKONE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:07-cv-01434-MCE-KJN vs. ORDER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 15 Defendant, 16 vs. 17 PAUL TA, et al., 18 Counterclaim-Defendants __________________________________/ 19 20 On June 15, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 22 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 23 Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 24 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 25 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 26 1983). 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 3 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 4 1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed June 15, 2010, are ADOPTED; 5 2. Defendant/Counterclaim plaintiff’s application for default judgement against 6 7 counterclaim defendant Paul Ta (Dkt. Nos. 75 and 77) is denied without prejudice. Dated: August 5, 2010 8 9 10 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
