(PC) Holliday v. Sisto et al, No. 2:2007cv01422 - Document 36 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 31 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 09/17/09 and ORDERING that dft Naku's 22 Motion for Summary judgment is GRANTED; dft Naku is TERMINATED as a party to this action; and this case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings as to plfs claim against dft Traquina. (Benson, A.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Holliday v. Sisto et al Doc. 36 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CURTIS HOLLIDAY, 12 No. CIV S-07-1422-LKK-CMK-P Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 B. NAKU, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 / 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 Eastern District of California local rules. 20 On June 26, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 21 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file 22 objections within a specified time. Timely objections to the findings and recommendations have 23 been filed. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72- 2 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire 3 file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 4 proper analysis. 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 6 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 26, 2009, are adopted in 8 2. Defendant Naku’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 22) is granted; 9 3. Defendant Naku is terminated as a party to this action; and 10 4. The case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings 7 11 12 full; as to plaintiff’s claim against defendant Traquina. DATED: September 17, 2009. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
