(PC) Hudson v. Smith et al, No. 2:2007cv01384 - Document 9 (E.D. Cal. 2008)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 8 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 2/1/08. Action is dismissed. CASE CLOSED(Dillon, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Hudson v. Smith et al Doc. 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HOWARD MAURICE HUDSON, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 15 16 No. CIV S-07-1384 WBS KJM P vs. OFFICER MICHAEL SMITH, Defendant. ORDER / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. 19 On November 16, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections 21 to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Although the court 22 received a letter from plaintiff on October 19, 2008, before the magistrate judge’s findings and 23 recommendations were filed, plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and 24 recommendations. Plaintiff’s letter does not alter this court’s decision. 25 26 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 ORDERED that: 2 ///// 3 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 16, 2007, are adopted in full; and 5 6 2. The action is dismissed. DATED: February 1, 2008 7 8 9 10 11 12 /huds1384.800 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
