(PS) Douglas v. Teen Triumph (Human Services Projects) et al, No. 2:2007cv01222 - Document 5 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/1/09 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice, and that the Clerk be directed to close this case. Matter referred to Judge England. WITHIN ten days after being served with these f&r's, pltf may file writtenobjections with the court. (Kastilahn, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) Douglas v. Teen Triumph (Human Services Projects) et al Doc. 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FLORENCE DOUGLAS, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. CIV S-07-1222 MCE EFB PS vs. TEEN TRIUMPH (HUMAN SERVICES PROJECT), et al., 14 Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 / 16 17 This action, in which plaintiff is proceeding in propria persona, was referred to the 18 undersigned under Local Rule 72-302(c)(21), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On January 30, 19 2009, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend. The order explained the 20 complaint’s deficiencies, gave plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint correcting those 21 deficiencies, and warned plaintiff that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a 22 recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or 23 24 otherwise responded to the order. 25 //// 26 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 2 prejudice, and that the Clerk be directed to close this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 3 11-110. 4 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 5 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days 6 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 7 objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 8 Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time 9 may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 10 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 11 DATED: April 1, 2009. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
