(HC) Reddick v. Felker et al, No. 2:2007cv01148 - Document 13 (E.D. Cal. 2008)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL 12 signed by Senior Judge Ronald S.W. Lew on 2/4/08: Petitioner's August 28, 2007 motion to hold proceedings in abeyance is granted 7 . Respondent's July 23, 2007 motion to dismiss is denied without prejudice in light of the granting of the requested stay and abeyance. This action is stayed and the Clerk is directed to administratively close the case. Case stayed. CASE ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. (Kaminski, H)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Reddick v. Felker et al Doc. 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLINTON MORRIS REDDICK, Petitioner, 11 vs. 12 13 No. CIV S-07-1148 LEW DAD P T. FELKER, Warden, Respondent. 14 ORDER / 15 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of 16 17 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States 18 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. On December 17, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 19 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither 22 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed December 17, 2007, are adopted in full; 3 4 2. Petitioner’s August 28, 2007 motion to hold proceedings in abeyance is granted; 5 6 3. Respondent’s July 23, 2007 motion to dismiss is denied without prejudice in light of the granting of the requested stay and abeyance; 7 4. Petitioner is ordered to present all unexhausted claims to the California 8 Supreme Court in a further state habeas corpus petition to be filed within thirty days from the 9 date of this order; 5. This action is stayed and the Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively 10 11 12 13 14 close the case; 6. Petitioner is ordered to file and serve a status report in this case on the first court day of each month; and 7. Petitioner is ordered to file and serve a motion to lift the stay of this action 15 within thirty days after petitioner is served with the California Supreme Court’s order disposing 16 of the state exhaustion petition. 17 18 Date: February 4, 2008 _______________________________ 19 20 HONORABLE RONALD S.W. LEW 21 Senior, U.S. District Court Judge 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
