(HC) Proctor v. Curry et al, No. 2:2007cv00377 - Document 18 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/6/2009 re 16 Findings and Recommendations; respondent is directed to file response to petition within 60 days; the clerk shall serve a copy of this order, petition, and the form regarding consent on Assistant AG, Michael Farrell. (cc: AG) (Gaydosh, J)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Proctor v. Curry et al Doc. 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GARLAND PROCTOR, 11 Petitioner, 12 13 vs. B. CURRY, Warden, 14 Respondent. 15 ORDER / 16 17 No. CIV S-07-0377 JAM DAD P Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 18 On March 12, 2009, the court issued findings and recommendations, 19 recommending that petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed as barred by 20 the statute of limitations. The court advised petitioner that if he wished to respond and 21 demonstrate to the court that he has filed this action within the applicable statute of limitations or 22 is eligible for statutory or equitable tolling of the limitations period, he could do so by filing 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. Petitioner has filed timely objections to the 24 court’s findings and recommendations. Therein, he claims that he is entitled to equitable tolling 25 of the statute of limitations based on his ongoing mental-health conditions. 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Good cause appearing, the court will vacate its findings and recommendations. 2 Since petitioner may be entitled to relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is 3 proved, respondent will be directed to file a response to petitioner’s application for a writ of 4 habeas corpus. 5 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 6 1. The court’s March 12, 2009 findings and recommendations (Doc. No. 16) are 7 vacated; 8 2. Respondent is directed to file a response to petitioner’s habeas petition within 9 sixty days from the date of this order. See Rule 4, Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. An answer 10 shall be accompanied by all transcripts and other documents relevant to the issues presented in 11 the petition. See Rule 5, Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases; 12 13 3. If the response to the habeas petition is an answer, petitioner’s reply, if any, shall be filed and served within thirty days after service of the answer; 14 4. If the response to the habeas petition is a motion, petitioner’s opposition or 15 statement of non-opposition to the motion shall be filed and served within thirty days after 16 service of the motion, and respondent’s reply, if any, shall be filed and served within fifteen days 17 thereafter; and 18 5. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order, a copy of the petition 19 for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and a copy of the form regarding consent 20 or request for reassignment on Michael Patrick Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General. 21 DATED: April 6, 2009. 22 23 24 DAD:9 proc0377.100 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
