(PC) Gipbsin v. Kernan et al, No. 2:2007cv00157 - Document 137 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER adopting 132 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/19/09: Plaintiff's September 22, 2008 motion, construed as a request for injunctive relief, is DENIED 44 . Plaintiff's November 10, 2008 motions for temporary restraining orders are DENIED 51 , 52 . Plaintiff's November 24, 2008 motion for federal placement is DENIED 55 . Plaintiff's March 9, 2009 motion is DENIED 113 . (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
(PC) Gipbsin v. Kernan et al Doc. 137 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CLARENCE A. GIPBSIN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:07-cv-00157-MCE-EFB P vs. ORDER SCOTT KERNAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 / 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. 20 On June 10, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days from the date the findings 23 and recommendations were served. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and 24 recommendations. 25 /// 26 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, 2 this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire 3 file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 4 proper analysis. 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 6 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 10, 2009, are adopted in full; 7 2. Plaintiff’s September 22, 2008 motion (docket no. 44), construed as a request for 8 9 10 11 12 injunctive relief, is DENIED; 3. Plaintiff’s November 10, 2008 motions for temporary restraining orders (docket nos. 51 and 52), are DENIED; 4. Plaintiff’s November 24, 2008 motion for federal placement (docket no. 55) is DENIED; and 13 5. Plaintiff’s March 9, 2009 motion (docket no. 113) is DENIED. 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 Dated: August 19, 2009 16 17 18 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.