(HC) Jones v. Kramer, No. 2:2006cv02583 - Document 15 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/18/09 ORDERING that the 14 findings and recommendations filed December 8, 2008, are adopted in full. This action is dismissed. CASE CLOSED. (Duong, D)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Jones v. Kramer Doc. 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES BERNARD JONES, JR., 11 Petitioner, 12 vs. 13 No. CIV S-06-2583 JAM EFB P M. C. KRAMER, 14 Respondent. 15 ORDER / 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of 17 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States 18 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. 19 On December 8, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner 22 has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed December 8, 2008, are adopted in full; and 2. This action is dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Rule 11 of the Rules 4 Governing Section 2254 Cases; L. R. 11-110. 5 DATED: February 18, 2009 6 7 /s/ John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
