(PC) Rotroff v. Mayberg et al, No. 2:2006cv02319 - Document 42 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/2/2009 re 39 Findings and Recommendations; 12 Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Denis K. Rotroff is DENIED. (Matson, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Rotroff v. Mayberg et al Doc. 42 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DENIS K. ROTROFF, 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff, vs. STEPHEN MAYBERG, et al., Defendants. 15 16 No. CIV S-06-2319 LKK KJM P ORDER / Plaintiff, a California civil detainee committed under California’s Sexually 17 Violent Predators Act, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 19 § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. 20 On September 25, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 21 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 22 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither 23 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 25,2008, are adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (#12) is denied. DATED: February 2, 2009. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
