(PC) Jackson v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al, No. 2:2006cv02023 - Document 143 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS 138 , in full, signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 8/19/2009. Defendants' 105 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and DENIED in part as follows: A) granted as to defendants Malfi, Leiber, Rodriguez, Ruller, Arndt, Baughman, Bernardino, Kelly, B. Smith, and Acting Warden Walker, in his individual capacity; B) denied as to defendants Haythorne, Hague, and Walker, in his official capacity only. (Marciel, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Jackson v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al Doc. 143 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER JACKSON, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 No. CIV S-06-2023 WBS GGH P vs. J. WALKER, et al., Defendants. 14 ORDER / 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 16 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. On June 17, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 19 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff, 22 who was granted an extension of time to do so, has filed objections to the findings and 23 recommendations, to which defendants have filed their response. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72- 24 25 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 26 entire ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 2 proper analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 17, 2009, are adopted in full; 5 2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, filed on January 30, 2009 (docket 6 7 8 9 # 105), is granted in part and denied in part, as follows: A. Granted as to defendants Malfi, Leiber, Rodriguez, Ruller, Arndt, Baughman, Bernardino, Kelly and Smith; B. Granted as to (Acting) Warden Walker, in his individual capacity; 10 C. Denied as to defendants Haythorne and Hague; and 11 D. Denied as to defendant Walker, in his official capacity only. 12 DATED: August 19, 2009 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
