(PC) Jackson v. Khoury et al, No. 2:2006cv01893 - Document 60 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 02/11/09 ordering plaintiff's 02/03/09 request for an extension of time 59 is granted. Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this order in which to file his objections to the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
(PC) Jackson v. Khoury et al Doc. 60 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND D. JACKSON, SR., 11 Plaintiff, 12 No. CIV S-06-1893 LKK DAD P vs. 13 NADIM KHOURY, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file objections to the magistrate 17 judge’s findings and recommendations of January 20, 2009. Good cause appearing, the court 18 will grant plaintiff one thirty-day extension of time to file objections. However, plaintiff is 19 advised that the purpose of filing objections to a magistrate judge’s findings and 20 recommendations is merely to identify the portions of the findings and recommendations to 21 which objection is made and the basis of the objection. The district judge will conduct a de novo 22 review of all portions of the findings and recommendations to which objections are made. The 23 purpose of such objections is not to provide the parties an opportunity to conduct additional 24 research and present new arguments that were not included in the motion heard by the assigned 25 magistrate judge. 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. Plaintiff’s February 3, 2009, request for an extension of time (Doc. No. 59) is 3 granted; and 4 2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file his 5 objections to the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations. 6 DATED: February 11, 2009. 7 8 9 10 DAD:9:kly jack1893.36obj 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.