(PC) Armentero v. Kramer et al, No. 2:2006cv01838 - Document 65 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 08/21/09 ordering plaintiff's motion for an extension of time 64 is granted. Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this order in which to file and serve objections to the 07/24/09 findings and recommendations. Plaintiff's motion for a jury trial 62 is denied without prejudice until the final resolution of the pending motions for summary judgment. (Plummer, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Armentero v. Kramer et al Doc. 65 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LUIS LORENZO ARMENTERO, Plaintiff, 11 12 vs. 13 No. CIV S-06-1838 GEB KJM P C. LEVAN, et al., Defendants. 14 / 15 Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file and serve objections to the July 16 17 ORDER 24, 2009 findings and recommendations. He has also filed a motion to schedule a jury trial. 18 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 19 1. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (Docket No. 64) is granted; 20 2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file and 21 serve objections to the July 24, 2009 findings and recommendations. 3. Plaintiff’s motion for a jury trial (docket no. 62) is denied without prejudice 22 23 until the final resolution of the pending motions for summary judgment. 24 DATED: August 21, 2009. 25 26 2/mp arme1838.36 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
