(HC) Roy v. Dovey, No. 2:2006cv01756 - Document 11 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/24/09 ORDERING the Findings and Recommendations 8 are ADOPTED IN FULL; this action is DISMISSED for pltf's failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. CASE CLOSED. (Carlos, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Roy v. Dovey Doc. 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LLOYD A. ROY, 11 Plaintiff, Defendant. 12 13 No. CIV S-06-1756 JAM EFB P ORDER vs. J. DOVEY, 14 15 / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. 19 On December 1, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections 21 to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed December 1, 2006, are adopted in full; and 2. This action is dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief 4 could be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 5 DATED: November 24, 2009 6 7 /s/ John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
