(PS) Fallon vs. U.S. Government, No. 2:2006cv01016 - Document 9 (E.D. Cal. 2008)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 2/1/08 ADOPTING 6 Order, Findings and Recommendations. This complaint is dismissed with prejudice. CASE CLOSED(Dillon, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) Fallon vs. U.S. Government Doc. 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID ANTHONY FALLON, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 vs. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, 14 15 CIV-S-06-1016 RRB GGH PS Defendant. ORDER __________________________________/ 16 On July 5, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 17 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 18 and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed. 19 Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. 20 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 21 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 22 1983). 23 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 24 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 25 \\\\\ 26 \\\\\ 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 2 1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed July 5, 2006, are 3 ADOPTED; and 4 5 2. The complaint is dismissed with prejudice. DATED: 2/1/2008 6 7 8 /s/ Ralph R. Beistline UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE fallon1016.jo 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
