(HC) Karr v. Sisto et al, No. 2:2006cv00599 - Document 15 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/8/2009 ADOPTING 14 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; This action is stayed pending final disposition of Hayward v Marshall. (Matson, R)

Download PDF
(HC) Karr v. Sisto et al Doc. 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD E. KARR, 11 Petitioner, 12 vs. 13 No. CIV S-06-0599 JAM DAD P D.K. SISTO, et al., 14 Respondents. 15 ORDER / 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of 17 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States 18 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. 19 On August 25, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither 22 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 25, 2009, are adopted in full; and 3 4 2. This action is stayed pending final disposition of Hayward v. Marshall. DATED: October 8, 2009 5 6 7 /s/ John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE /karr0599.801 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.