(PC) Noonkester v. Tehama County Sheriff, et al, No. 2:2006cv00306 - Document 70 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 08/31/09 ADOPTING 60 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; and GRANTING 59 Defendant Transcor America's Motion to Dismiss. (Streeter, J)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Noonkester v. Tehama County Sheriff, et al Doc. 70 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RILEY NOONKESTER, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. CIV S-06-0306 JAM GGH P vs. TEHAMA COUNTY SHERIFF, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 17 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 18 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. 19 On June 26, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither 22 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 26, 2009, are adopted in full; 2 2. Defendant Transcor America’s motion to dismiss (docket # 59) is granted. 3 DATED: August 31, 2009 4 5 /s/ John A. Mendez 6 U. S. District Court Judge 7 noon0306.801 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
