(HC) Stinson v. Veal et al, No. 2:2006cv00068 - Document 22 (E.D. Cal. 2007)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. on 6/22/07 ORDERING the 3/21/07 order and judgment 16 17 are VACATED. The Findings and Recommendations 12 are ADOPTED IN FULL. This action is DISMISSED. CASE CLOSED. (Carlos, K) Modified on 6/25/2007 (Carlos, K).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Stinson v. Veal et al Doc. 22 Case 2:06-cv-00068-FCD-EFB Document 22 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK LEE STINSON, 11 Petitioner, 12 13 No. CIV S-06-0068 FCD EFB P vs. MARTIN VEAL, Warden, et al., 14 Respondents. ORDER / 15 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ 16 17 of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States 18 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. On January 17, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 19 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. On 22 February 21, 2007, petitioner was granted an additional twenty days in which to file objections. 23 On March 21, 2007, the undersigned adopted the findings and recommendations, dismissed this 24 action and judgment was entered accordingly. That same day, the Clerk filed plaintiff’s belated 25 objections. 26 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:06-cv-00068-FCD-EFB Document 22 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 2 of 2 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72- 1 2 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 3 entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and 4 by proper analysis. 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 6 1. The order and judgment entered on March 21, 2007, are vacated; 7 2. The findings and recommendations filed January 17, 2007, are adopted in full; 8 9 10 and 3. This action is dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(b). DATED: June 22, 2007. 11 12 13 _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
