(HC) Evins v. Kane et al, No. 2:2005cv02224 - Document 23 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: DISMISSAL ORDER signed by District Judge Timothy M. Burgess on 7/20/2010 ORDERING that the petition for habeas corpus relief filed herein is DISMISSED. The Clerk of the Court to enter final judgment accordingly. CASE CLOSED. (Reader, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Evins v. Kane et al Doc. 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GLYNNON EVINS, No. 2:05-cv-02224-TMB Petitioner, DISMISSAL ORDER vs. RANDY GROUNDS, Warden (A), Correctional Training Facility, Respondent. Petitioner Glynnon Evins, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S. § 2254 challenging the Governor’s reversal of the decision of the Board of Parole Hearings to grant him parole. At Docket No. 21 Respondent notified the Court that on June 17, 2010, Petitioner was released from custody to parole status. Consequently, Respondent contends this matter should be dismissed as moot. Under the facts and circumstances of this case as set forth in the pleadings on file, the court has determined that there is no further appropriate relief that this court could grant. Accordingly, the matter is now moot.1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT the petition for habeas corpus relief filed herein is DISMISSED. The Clerk of the Court to enter final judgment accordingly. Dated: July 20, 2010. s/ Timothy M. Burgess TIMOTHY M. BURGESS United States District Judge 1 See Church of Scientology v. United States, 506 U.S. 9, 12 (1992); Serena v. Mock, 547 F.3d 1051, 1053 (9th Cir. 2008) (quoting Feldman v. Bomar, 518 F.3d 637, 642 (9th Cir. 2008)); Ruvalcaba v. City of Los Angeles, 167 F.3d 514, 521 (9th Cir. 1999). Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
