(PC) Jackson v. Andreasen et al, No. 2:2005cv01872 - Document 70 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/24/09 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 10/27/09 66 are ADOPTED in full; Plaintiff's 3/2/09 55 and 3/06/09 56 Requests, construed as Motion for relief from judgment are DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Jackson v. Andreasen et al Doc. 70 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRED LEON JACKSON, JR., 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff, vs. DR. R. L. ANDREASEN, et al., Defendants. 15 16 No. 2:05-cv-1872-LKK-JFM (PC) ORDER / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. 19 On October 27, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff 22 has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72- 24 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire 25 file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 26 proper analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 27, 2009, are adopted in full; 3 4 and 2. Plaintiff’s March 2, 2009 and March 6, 2009 requests, construed as a motion 5 for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), are denied. 6 DATED: November 24, 2009. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
