(PC) Cejas v. Blanas, No. 2:2005cv01799 - Document 98 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/5/09 ORDERING pltf's motion to amend the judgment 96 and motion for leave to file an appeal 97 are DENIED; pltf is granted 21 days from the date of this order to file objections to the findings and recommendations. (Carlos, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Cejas v. Blanas Doc. 98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDREW A. CEJAS, 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff, vs. LOU BLANAS, et al., Defendants. 15 16 No. CIV S-05-1799 LKK GGH P ORDER / On October 14, 2009, the undersigned recommended that defendant’s summary 17 judgment motion be granted. On October 26, 2009, plaintiff filed a motion to amend the 18 judgment. On that date, plaintiff filed a motion to file an appeal from any order denying his 19 motion to amend the judgment. 20 Because no judgment has been entered, plaintiff’s motion to amend the judgment 21 is improper. If plaintiff disagrees with the findings and recommendations, he should file 22 objections. Accordingly, the motion to amend the judgment is denied. Plaintiff does not require 23 court permission to file a notice of appeal. 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 25 1. Plaintiff’s motion to amend the judgment (no. 96) and motion for leave to file 26 an appeal (no. 97) are denied; 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2. Plaintiff is granted twenty-one days from the date of this order to file 2 objections to the findings and recommendations. 3 DATED: November 5, 2009 4 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 cej1799.ame 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
