(PC) Jackson v. Runnels, No. 2:2005cv01531 - Document 187 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 04/16/09 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections due within 20 days. (Plummer, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Jackson v. Runnels Doc. 187 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCHEA JACKSON, 11 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1531 LKK EFB P vs. D.L. RUNNELS, et al., Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS / On March 19, 2009, plaintiff was ordered to, within 20 days, either explain his failure to 17 comply with the court’s January 28, 2009 order, or to submit the documents required to effect 18 service of the second amended complaint. The court cautioned plaintiff that failure to do so 19 would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The 20 day period has now 20 expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order or submitted the documents required 21 to effect service of the second amended complaint. Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED 22 that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 23 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 24 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days 25 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 26 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 2 within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. 3 Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 DATED: April 16, 2009. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
