(PC) Craig v. Hougland, No. 2:2005cv01441 - Document 29 (E.D. Cal. 2008)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 2/1/2008 re 27 Findings and Recommendations; This action is dismissed w/out prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Matson, R) Modified on 2/4/2008 (Matson, R).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Craig v. Hougland Doc. 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN CRAIG, JR., 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 No. CIV S-05-1441 RRB EFB P C. HOUGLAND, 14 Defendant. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. 19 On December 21, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither 22 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed December 21, 2006, are adopted in full; and 3 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f); Local 4 Rule 11-110. 5 DATED: 2/1/2008 6 7 /s/ Ralph R. Beistline UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 / 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
