(HC) Williams v. CDC et al, No. 2:2005cv01286 - Document 18 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/14/10 ordering the clerk of court is directed to serve copies of this order, the court's 05/14/09 findings and recommendations 13 and the order adopting those findings and recommendations 14 on both petitioner's current address of record at the Santa Rita Jail and his prior address of record at Salinas Valley State Prison. (Plummer, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Williams v. CDC et al Doc. 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY RAYNAIL WILLIAMS, Petitioner, 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 No. CIV S-05-1286 GEB DAD P vs. WARDEN M.S. EVENS, et al., Respondents. ORDER / Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Local Rule 182(f) requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the 19 court of any address change. On April 23, 2009, petitioner notified this court of a change of 20 address, reporting that he had been moved from Salinas Valley State Prison to the Santa Rita Jail 21 in Dublin, California and providing the court with the mailing address of the facility where he 22 was now incarcerated. (Doc. No. 12.) On May 14, 2009, findings and recommendations were 23 issued recommending that petitioner’s application for writ of habeas corpus be denied. (Doc. No. 24 13.) Those findings and recommendations were served on petitioner at the address he provided 25 in his April 23, 2009, notice of change of address. However, on June 8, 2009, those findings and 26 recommendations were returned to the court as undeliverable. Petitioner failed to file objections 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 and did not notify the court of any further change in his address of record. On June 30, 2009, the 2 findings and recommendations were adopted in full by the assigned district judge and this case 3 was closed. (Doc. No. 14.) On July 8, 2009, the order adopting the findings and 4 recommendations that had been served on petitioner at his address of record was also returned to 5 the court as undeliverable. Not until October 18, 2010 and again on December 9, 2010, over fifteen months 6 7 after this action was closed, did petitioner inquire about the status of his habeas action, stating 8 that “it has been 4-years and I have not heard from the courts.” (Doc No. 16,17.) Petitioner, 9 however, has not heard from the court because he has failed to provide this court with his current 10 address, as is his responsibility under Local Rule 182(f). It appears from his recent filings that 11 petitioner may be once again incarcerated at Salinas Valley State Prison. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve copies of this order, the 12 13 court’s May 14, 2009 findings and recommendations (Doc. No. 13) and the order adopting those 14 findings and recommendations (Doc. No. 14) on both petitioner’s current address of record at the 15 Santa Rita Jail and his prior address of record at Salinas Valley State Prison.1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 17 DATED: December 14, 2010. 18 19 20 21 DAD:6 williams1286.order 22 23 24 25 26 1 That address is: Anthony Raynail Williams V-07297 Salinas Valley State Prison P.O. Box 1020 Soledad, CA 93960-1020 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
