(HC) Edmonton v. People, No. 2:2005cv00855 - Document 57 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/31/09 ORDERING the Findings and Recommendations ADOPTED IN FULL; this action is DISMISSED; and the Clerk is directed to enter judgment and close this file. CASE CLOSED. (Carlos, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Edmonton v. People Doc. 57 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KENNETH I. EDMONTON, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. CIV S-05-0855-LKK-CMK-P vs. ORDER STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 / 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of 18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. 20 On July 9, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections 22 within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.1 23 /// 24 1 25 26 Although it appears from the file that the findings and recommendations were returned, the parties were properly served. It is the responsibility of the parties to keep the court apprised of their address of record at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(d), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 9, 2009, are adopted in full; 5 2. This action is dismissed, without prejudice, for petitioner’s failure to file a 6 supplemental brief as required by the court’s May 22, 2009, order as well as failure to keep the 7 court apprised of his current address; and 8 9 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. DATED: August 31, 2009. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
