(HC) Beasley v. Finn et al, No. 2:2005cv00851 - Document 29 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this action be dismissed signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/30/10: Objections to F&R due within twenty one days. (Kaminski, H)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Beasley v. Finn et al Doc. 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIE RAY BEASLEY, 11 12 13 14 Petitioner, vs. CLAUDE E. FINN, et al., Respondents. 15 16 No. 2:05-cv-0851 JAM KJN P FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION / Petitioner is proceeding without counsel on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus 17 filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner challenges a 2002 denial of parole by the Board of 18 Parole Hearings. On May 7, 2009, counsel for respondents filed a notice that petitioner was 19 paroled on April 22, 2009, after being found suitable for parole in a 2008 hearing by the Board of 20 Parole hearings. On February 12, 2010, the court ordered petitioner to show cause within thirty 21 days why this action should not be dismissed as moot. Petitioner has not responded or otherwise 22 responded to the court’s order. 23 24 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 26 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 2 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 3 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 4 objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 5 parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 6 appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 7 DATED: April 30, 2010 8 9 10 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 beas0851.dsm 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
