(PC) Bailey v. Wedell, et al, No. 2:2004cv02067 - Document 111 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 10/21/2009 ORDERING 105 The findings and recommendations, are ADOPTED in full; and 76 , 77 , 78 Defendants' motions for summary judgment are GRATNED. (Reader, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Bailey v. Wedell, et al Doc. 111 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIE BAILEY, III, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 No. CIV S-04-2067 GEB EFB P J. WEDELL, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. 19 On August 25, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither 22 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 25, 2009, are adopted in full; and 3 2. Defendants’ motions for summary judgment (Docket Nos. 76, 77, 78) are 4 granted. 5 Dated: October 21, 2009 6 7 8 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
