-GGH (HC) Rameses v. Lacey, et al, No. 2:2004cv01173 - Document 98 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 10/28/11 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 10/4/11 95 are ADOPTED in full; Petitioner's third MOTION for Relief from Judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b), filed on 9/2/11 94 is DISMISSED; And Any further filings from Petitioner in this closed case are to disregarded. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
-GGH (HC) Rameses v. Lacey, et al Doc. 98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT RAMESES, 11 12 13 14 Petitioner, vs. SCOTT KERNAN, et al., Respondents. 15 16 No. CIV S-04-1173 GEB GGH P ORDER / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ 17 of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States 18 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On October 4, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner 22 has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 24 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire 25 file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 26 proper analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 4, 2011, are adopted in full; 3 2. Petitioner’s third motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b), filed 4 5 6 on September 2, 2011 (Docket No. 94), is dismissed; and 3. Any further filings from petitioner in this closed case are to be disregarded. Dated: October 28, 2011 7 8 9 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.