(PC) Greene v. Rourk, No. 2:2004cv00917 - Document 128 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: STIPULATION and ORDER 127 re withdrawal of 124 Objections to Findings and Recommendations and Settlement Negotiations signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 8/28/2009. Parties agree that defendant Rourk shall have additional 30 days from date of this Stipulation to file her Objections to 122 Findings and Recommendations. Parties further agree that plaintiff's Responsive Brief will be filed w/in 10 days of defendant's re-filing of her Objections. (Marciel, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Greene v. Rourk 1 2 3 4 Doc. 128 WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES 1250 Sutterville Road, Suite 290 Sacramento, CA 95822 (916) 456-1122 (916) 737-1126 (fax) Kathleen J. Williams, CSB #127021 Martha M. Stringer, CSB #156333 5 Attorneys for defendants SOLANO COUNTY 6 (erroneously sued herein as “Solano County Jail Claybank Facility) and LT. PEGGY ROURK 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 DARIN DEMETRIUS GREENE, Plaintiff, 12 13 vs. 14 SOLANO COUNTY JAIL (CLAYBANK FACILITY), 15 Defendant. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO: CIV-04-0917 MCE DAD P STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING WITHDRAWAL OF OBJECTIONS TO FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS 17 /// 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 Greene v. Rourke [CIV S 04-0917-MCE DAD P]/Stip Re: Settlem ent Negotiations Page 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 Whereas, the parties are continuing in settlement negotiations and believe that further negotiations may be productive, the parties hereby stipulate that, to that end, defendant ROURK shall have an additional thirty days from the date of this stipulation 4 5 to file (or refile) her objections to the Magistrates Findings and Recommendations on 6 defendant’s motion for summary judgment, should settlement negotiations prove 7 unfruitful. The parties further agree that plaintiff’s responsive brief will be filed within 10 8 days of defendant’s refiling of her objections, should the same become necessary. 9 Dated: August 20, 2009 WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES 10 11 By: /s/ Martha M. Stringer MARTHA M. STRINGER, CSB #156333 Attorneys for defendant, LT. PEGGY ROURK 12 13 14 Dated: August 20, 2009 BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER, LLP 15 16 By:/s/ Fred Norton (signed by permission) FRED NORTON, CSB # 224725 Attorneys for plaintiff DARREN GREENE 17 18 19 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED Dated: August 28, 2009 22 23 24 ______________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 25 26 27 28 Greene v. Rourke [CIV S 04-0917-MCE DAD P]/Stip Re: Settlem ent Negotiations Page 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
