(PC) Williams v. Sandham, et al, No. 2:2003cv02044 - Document 115 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 01/21/09 recommending that defendants Watson and Baron be dismissed from this action without prejudice. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections due within 20 days. (Plummer, M)
Download PDF
(PC) Williams v. Sandham, et al Doc. 115 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN WILLIAMS, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:03-cv-2044-LKK-JFM (PC) vs. NORMAN BARON, C.M.O., et al., Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / By an order filed June 25, 2008, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return 17 to the court, within sixty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendants 18 Watson and Baron. By order filed November 7, 2009, the time to comply with the June 25, 2008 19 order was extended by another sixty days. The latter sixty day period has since passed, and 20 plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order. 21 22 23 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendants Watson and Baron be dismissed from this action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States 24 District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 25 twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file 26 written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 2 time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 3 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 DATED: January 21, 2009. 5 6 7 8 9 12 will2044.fusm 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.