(PC) Woods v. Runnels, et al, No. 2:2003cv01976 - Document 69 (E.D. Cal. 2007)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. on 3/15/07 ORDERING that the 68 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED in FULL. Dft's 43 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to close the case. CASE CLOSED. (Engbretson, K.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Woods v. Runnels, et al Doc. 69 Case 2:03-cv-01976-GEB-EFB Document 69 Filed 03/15/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CEDRIC WOODS, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 2:03-cv-1976-GEB-EFB-P vs. D.L. RUNNELS, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. 19 On February 22, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither 22 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:03-cv-01976-GEB-EFB 1 2 Document 69 Filed 03/15/2007 Page 2 of 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 22, 2007, are adopted in full; 3 2. Defendants’ June 1, 2006, motion for summary judgment is granted; and 4 3. The Clerk is directed to close the case. 5 Dated: March 15, 2007 6 7 8 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
