(HC) Nguyen v. Knowles, et al, No. 2:2002cv02758 - Document 35 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/16/2010 ADOPTING 29 Findings and Recommendations in full. Ptnr's application for a writ of habeas corpus is GRANTED as to the sentence imposed following his conviction. The state of California is GRANTED a period of 30 days in which to elect to retry Ptnr or to resentence him. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
(HC) Nguyen v. Knowles, et al Doc. 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HUNG PHUOC NGUYEN, 11 12 13 14 Petitioner, vs. MIKE KNOWLES, et al., Respondents. 15 16 No. 2:02-cv-2758 LKK JFM (HC) ORDER / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed this application 17 for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United 18 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On August 3, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. After 22 receiving an extension of time, both parties have filed objections to the findings and 23 recommendations. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 25 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire 26 file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 proper analysis. 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 3, 2010, are adopted in full; 4 2. Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus is granted as to the sentence 5 6 imposed following his conviction; and 3. The State of California is granted a period of thirty days in which to elect to 7 retry petitioner or to resentence him. 8 DATED: September 16, 2010. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.